Around the World in 80 Days
March 3rd, 2010 Posted in Gadget Reviews
Description
Get ready for phenomenal fun, spectacular adventures, and nonstop action as hilarious megastar Jackie Chan (SHANGHAI NOON, SHANGHAI KNIGHTS) dares to do what no one has done before — beat the clock in a race around the world. Traveling the globe by land, sea, air, and even in-line skates, Chan and his buddies are greeted with impossible obstacles at every planned and unplanned stop along the way, making their fantastically speedy voyage more frantic and heart-pounding than ever! Filled with amazing stunts, humor, and the importance of friendship and following your dreams, AROUND THE WORLD IN 80 DAYS is one trip the whole family will enjoy taking together.Amazon.com
The 2004 version of Around the World in 80… More >>
Related Posts
March 3rd, 2010 at 1:43 pm
this movie sucked.this movie may just be out in 1 month.it just was plain boring,dumb,& a waste of money!
Rating: 1 / 5
March 3rd, 2010 at 3:30 pm
Answer is :Jackie Chan. The guy is good when it comes to Martial Arts, but he sucks as an actor. He isn’t even funny, why do people put him in comedies? makes no sense to me.
I didnt see that movie, not planning to do so, did see otehr Jackie Chan movie, either they sucked or we’re okay.
Rush Hour sucked too, second part was bit better suprisingly. Ususaly sequals suck, but this time it was improvement.
I think he should retire from movie business, you wanna see good martial arts movie check out UNLEASHED with Jet Li, suppose to come out on DVD in October.
Rating: 1 / 5
March 3rd, 2010 at 3:59 pm
Disclosure: I did not sit through this entire movie. The tedium and boredom won out after 60 minutes of abuse inflicted by watching this horrible film.
This movie is so poorly written and acted that only viewers younger than 12 could find enough enjoyment to warrant their attention. There is nothing here that is fun, entertaining, exciting, funny, or remarkable in any way; except for its awfulness. That is remarkable.
Rating: 1 / 5
March 3rd, 2010 at 4:59 pm
This is worst movie i have ever seen. NO talent was exhibited-the acting blew, the script was horrendous, the “humour” was not humorous, and it contained about every racial cliche in the book. top that with a predictable forced romance, ridiculously bad accents, and a scene in china that has abosolutly nothing to do with the story. i would not want to own this movie even if it was being given away free, which it will probably end up being, because it sucks. the only reason i saw it was because i was on an airplane and incredibly bored….although i regret it now and i would have been happier threading my hair into a loom and ripping it out of my skull as i weave a blanket for mutant, orphaned, third-world llamas.
Rating: 1 / 5
March 3rd, 2010 at 7:50 pm
This is a highly glossy, effects-filled movie as befits its $100+ million production budget.
Unfortunately, as also befits its total box office take of about $24 million, the film, loosely based on the Jules Verne novel, is saddled with a stilted script, many jokes that fall flat, uninteresting cameos (except for the Brothers Wilson – Luke and Owen – who had a certain charm), and unoriginal fight choreography.
Those wishing to see Jackie Chan in better form in an American production are advised to see “Shanghai Knights”.
Rating: 2 / 5